Ariva AI

Advisory Practice

AI Governance Advisory
for Operational Enterprises

Most enterprises have deployed AI. Few have governed it. Our advisory practice closes that gap — designing the governance architecture your organization needs before regulators, incidents, or board inquiries force the issue.

What We Deliver

Governance architecture, not generic consulting

Every engagement produces artefacts your team can act on — and that Arbiter can enforce.

01

Governance Assessment

A structured review of your current AI deployments: what's running, where decisions are made, what controls exist, and what gaps create operational or regulatory exposure.

Deliverables

  • AI deployment inventory
  • Control gap matrix
  • Risk severity scoring
  • Executive findings brief
02

AI Risk Discovery

Identify where AI decisions intersect with regulated domains, financial exposure, reputational risk, or fiduciary obligations. Map the blast radius before an incident maps it for you.

Deliverables

  • Risk taxonomy by deployment
  • Regulatory exposure analysis
  • Failure mode catalogue
  • Escalation threshold recommendations
03

Operational Dependency Mapping

Document how AI systems interact with human workflows, downstream processes, and business-critical decisions. Understand where removing AI would break operations — and where AI is flying blind.

Deliverables

  • Human-AI decision flow diagrams
  • Dependency graph by process area
  • Override and fallback inventory
  • Accountability assignment matrix
04

Policy & Control Design

Translate governance requirements into operational policy: model usage rules, budget limits, output guardrails, approval thresholds, and escalation triggers — written to be enforced, not aspirational.

Deliverables

  • Governance policy document
  • Model usage standards
  • Approval authority matrix
  • Control specification (Arbiter-ready)
05

Approval Workflow Design

Design the approval logic that governs high-stakes AI decisions — who approves, under what conditions, with what evidence, and within what timeframe. Designed to scale without bottlenecking operations.

Deliverables

  • Approval workflow maps
  • Escalation path definitions
  • Timebound approval SLAs
  • Arbiter workflow configuration
06

Separation of Duties Review

Identify where a single team or individual has both AI deployment authority and oversight responsibility. Flag conflicts and recommend role boundaries that satisfy audit requirements.

Deliverables

  • SoD conflict register
  • Role boundary recommendations
  • Access control design
  • Audit committee presentation
07

Resilience Planning

Model what happens when AI systems fail, degrade, or behave unexpectedly. Design human fallback paths, incident response playbooks, and recovery procedures that actually work under pressure.

Deliverables

  • AI failure scenario library
  • Human fallback procedures
  • Incident response playbook
  • Recovery time objectives (RTOs)
08

Arbiter Implementation Roadmap

Translate your governance architecture into an Arbiter deployment plan: which modules to activate first, integration sequencing, pilot scope, and a 90-day path to production enforcement.

Deliverables

  • Module activation sequence
  • Integration architecture diagram
  • Pilot scope definition
  • 90-day implementation plan

Advisory + Platform

Advisory designs it. Arbiter enforces it.

The advisory practice doesn't just produce documents — it produces governance specifications that Arbiter operationalises in production.

Design

Advisory Practice

We assess your AI deployments, identify governance gaps, and design the controls your organization needs.

Specify

Governance Specs

Advisory deliverables are structured as Arbiter-compatible specifications: policies, thresholds, approval rules, guardrail definitions.

Enforce

Arbiter Platform

Arbiter enforces governance in production — every AI call, every budget limit, every approval requirement, every audit record.

Engagement Types

How we work with enterprise clients

Structured engagements designed around your governance maturity, timeline, and risk profile.

01

Governance Rapid Assessment

Duration

2 weeks

Format

Remote

Suitable for

First-time AI governance engagement or board readiness check

Outcome

Assessment report, risk register, priority recommendations, Arbiter readiness score

02

Executive Governance Workshop

Duration

1 day

Format

On-site or remote

Suitable for

Board, C-suite, or risk committee — governance strategy alignment

Outcome

Governance mandate, risk appetite statement, initial control framework

03

Governance Architecture Sprint

Duration

4–6 weeks

Format

Embedded (3 days/week)

Suitable for

Organizations deploying AI at scale or facing regulatory scrutiny

Outcome

Full governance architecture: policies, controls, workflows, Arbiter deployment plan

04

Arbiter Implementation Advisory

Duration

Ongoing

Format

Weekly retainer

Suitable for

Organizations deploying Arbiter and needing governance iteration support

Outcome

Governance programme management, policy iteration, incident review, board reporting

How We Think

Our governance principles

Governance must be operable

A governance framework that lives in a document is not governance. We design controls that can be enforced in production — by systems, not hope.

Risk appetite precedes architecture

Before designing controls, we establish what your organization is willing to tolerate. Governance without risk appetite produces bureaucracy, not safety.

Accountability must be assigned

Every AI decision with material consequences needs a named accountable role. 'The model decided' is not an acceptable answer to a regulator, board, or affected customer.

Evidence must be automatic

Audit-readiness built on manual reporting fails at the worst time. Controls designed to produce evidence automatically — through Arbiter — are the only credible basis for compliance.

Get Started

Start with a governance workshop

A structured one-day session with your leadership team. We assess your current AI posture, align on governance principles, and identify the priority controls your organization needs — with a clear path to implementation.